Concomitant use of hydroxyzine and haloperidol did not worsen delirium in patients with cancer: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: There is concern that hydroxyzine exacerbates delirium, but a recent preliminary study suggested that the combination of haloperidol and hydroxyzine was effective against delirium. This study examined whether the concomitant use of hydroxyzine and haloperidol worsened delirium in patients with cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study was conducted at 2 general hospitals in Japan. The medical records of patients with cancer who received haloperidol for delirium from July to December 2020 were reviewed. The treatments for delirium included haloperidol alone or haloperidol combined with hydroxyzine. The primary outcome was the duration from the first day of haloperidol administration to the resolution of delirium, defined as its absence for 2 consecutive days. The time to delirium resolution was analyzed to compare the haloperidol group and hydroxyzine combination group using the log-rank test with the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes were (1) the total dose of antipsychotic medications, including those other than haloperidol (measured in chlorpromazine-equivalent doses), and (2) the frequencies of detrimental incidents during delirium, specifically falls and self-removal of drip infusion lines. The unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 497 patients who received haloperidol, 118 (23.7%) also received hydroxyzine. No significant difference in time to delirium resolution was found between the haloperidol group and the hydroxyzine combination group (log-rank test, P = 0.631). No significant difference between groups was found in either chlorpromazine-equivalent doses or the frequency of detrimental incidents. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This study showed that the concomitant use of hydroxyzine and haloperidol did not worsen delirium in patients with cancer.

Development of a simultaneous analytical method for clozapine and its metabolites in human plasma using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry with linear range adjusted by in-source collision-induced dissociation.

Clozapine (CLZ) is a key drug in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of CLZ and its metabolites, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide, is required to monitor and manage the risks of side effects. Although quantification methods for TDM have been developed for CLZ and its metabolites, they were not sufficiently accurate for the quantification of CLZ owing to the upper limits of the calibration curves. An analytical method using high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated for the simultaneous measurement of CLZ and its metabolites in human plasma. To expand the concentration range of the calibration curves, we used a linear range shift technique using in-source collision-induced dissociation (CID). Using our approach, the linearity and quantitative range were improved compared to those reported by previous studies, and were sufficient for TDM in clinical practice. The intra- and inter-assay accuracy was 84.6%-114.8%, and the intra- and inter-assay precisions were ≤9.1% and ≤9.9%, respectively. Moreover, all samples from patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were successfully quantified. Therefore, our novel analytical method using in-source CID had the appropriate performance to measure the plasma concentrations of CLZ and its metabolites for TDM in clinical practice.

Examination of the prescription of antiepileptic drugs to prenatal and postpartum women in Japan from a health administrative database.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence and patterns of prescriptions of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to prenatal and postpartum women in Japan using a large administrative database. METHODS: The dates of pregnancy onset and delivery were estimated using published algorithms and infant birth months. The prevalence of prescribed AEDs, the maximum dose of some AEDs, and the frequency of potential combination therapy with AEDs were evaluated for the 180 days before pregnancy onset, during pregnancy, and at 180-day postpartum. RESULTS: In total, 33 941 pregnant women were eligible for analysis. At least one AED was prescribed to 225 women (66 per 10 000 deliveries) between 180 days before pregnancy and 180-day postpartum and for 135 women (40 per 10 000 deliveries) during pregnancy. The prevalence of AED prescription declined during the first and second trimesters and increased in the third trimester and postpartum. Valproate was the most frequently prescribed drug, followed by clonazepam, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine. Nine (18.4%) of the 49 women with at least one prescription record of valproate in the first trimester were prescribed more than 600 mg/day of valproate. Concerning potential combination therapy, 40 (12 per 10 000 deliveries) concurrently received two or more AEDs between 180 days before pregnancy and 180-day postpartum, respectively, 31 (9 per 10 000 deliveries) women received these drugs during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Various AEDs were prescribed to pregnant Japanese women. Women of reproductive age should select the appropriate AED before becoming pregnant, depending on the risk benefit profile.

Relationships between sunitinib plasma concentration and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the relationships between total sunitinib plasma concentrations (sunitinib plus its active metabolite; N-desethyl sunitinib) and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: Twenty patients with mRCC were enrolled following treatment with sunitinib. To assess safety, the total sunitinib concentration range up to discontinuation of treatment and dosage reduction associated with adverse events within 6 weeks from initiating administration were analyzed. The longest administered sunitinib dosage was defined as the maintenance dose, and the relationship between total sunitinib concentration at the maintenance dosage and sunitinib efficacy was investigated. RESULTS: Total sunitinib concentration was significantly higher in patients who discontinued treatment or had dosage reduction due to adverse events within 6 weeks after initiation of sunitinib than in patients who continued treatment with the initial dosage. The time to treatment failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival were better in patients with total sunitinib concentrations < 50 ng/mL than in those with concentrations ≥ 50 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the effective range of total sunitinib concentration in Japanese patients with mRCC was lower than 50-100 ng/mL which was previously reported. These results indicate that therapeutic drug monitoring could maintain the therapeutic effect of sunitinib while minimizing adverse events by personalizing sunitinib dosages for Japanese patients with mRCC.